BA Theories (Business Administration & Management)

What is Organization?

Organizational Behaviour

What is an organisation?

An ‘organisation’ is a group of individuals working together to achieve one or more objectives. Although organisations have been defined differently by different theorists, virtually all definitions refer to five common features:

Organizations are a complex phenomenon that are rather vague and abstract in nature. Mooney and Riley (1939), along with Keith Davis (1977), emphasize on the human aspect of organizations, by defining organizations as a ‘group of individuals, along with all inter relations and interactions, who work to attain a common objective under effective leadership.’

In contrast, Richard Daft, in his book, ‘Organisation Theory and Design’, along with Jonathan Murphy and Hugh Willmott, defines organizations as, ‘social entities, that are goal-directed, are designed as deliberately structured and coordinated activity systems, and are linked to the external environment’ (2010, p. 10). Therefore, following Daft et al., the concepts of structure and organisation are closely related and thus, cannot be separated. Organizations implicitly possess structuring, as the term organisation itself implies a planned and systemized set of activities.

Louis Allen says Organization is the process of identifying and grouping work to be performed, defining and delegating responsibility and authority, and establishing relationships so that employees are able to work effectively together in accomplishing objectives.” An organization helps achieve organizational goals. The work of each and every person is defined and authority and responsibility is fixed for accomplishing the same.

Organizational development refers to processes that are used to continually attain organizational goals and objectives.

Standardization

The number and control of repeatable processes vary from organisation to another.

In the classic manufacturing assembly plant there is much which is standardised

Professional organisations such as consultancies will have less control Organisations that that work flexibility will have less standardisation.

Mintzberg’s five components of organisation

Mintzberg (1979, p. 24) suggested that all organisations consist of five components:

  1. Strategic apex is at the top of the organisation. The purpose is to ensure the organisation follows its mission and manages its relationship with its environment.

    The individuals comprising the apex, for example the Chief Executive Officer (CEO), are responsible to owners, government agencies, unions, communities and so on, these can be referred to as Stakeholders.

    Below the apex are:

  2. Middle line – a group of managers who are concerned with converting the objectives and broad plans of the Strategic apex into operational plans that can be carried out by the workers.

  3. Technostructure – As organisations grow and become more complex, they usually develop a separate group of people (analysts) who are concerned with the best way of doing a job, specifying output criteria (e.g., quality standards) and ensuring that personnel have appropriate skills (e.g. by organising training programmes).

  4. Support staff – The organisation also adds other administrative functions that provide services to itself, e.g. legal advice, public relations, mailroom, cafeteria etc.

    And finally, the bottom of the organisation:

  5. Operating core. These are the people who do the basic work of producing the products or delivering the services.

Flexibility in Organisations

What is Flexible working?

Flexible working’ describes a type of working arrangement which gives a degree of flexibility on how long, where, when and at what times employees work (CIPD Definition)

Flexible working practices include

Benefits to business of flexible working

Flexible working leads to direct and indirect business benefits.

The direct business benefits are associated with:

Indirect business benefits are achieved through an improved employee psychological contract.

An employee survey carried out for the CIPD by Kingston University/Ipsos MORI Working life: employee attitudes and engagement 2006 found that: ‘workers on flexible contracts tend to be more emotionally engaged, more satisfied with their work, more likely to speak positively about their organisation and less likely to quit’.

Flexible working options can also be attractive for new talent, especially as employee expectations change with regard to their jobs, careers and work-life balance, and demographic changes affect employees’ needs to balance their job with other responsibilities such as caring.

Flexibility in organisations

Flexibility in organisations is necessary for providing employees a decent and conducive work environment. A flexible organisation: does not have any unwanted or unnecessary restrictions or rules that can have a negative effect on the morale of the employees aims at making work fun and enjoyable and easier for the workers – aids motivation.

The following are the kinds of flexibility in a flexible organizational structure:

Disadvantages of Flexibility in organisations

Although there are many advantages of flexible structure, there are also some problems associated with it.

Characteristics of a Flexible Organisation

Researchers suggest that in flexible organisations we can see the following trends

Change models and frameworks

The pace and nature of change is accelerating, which is creating a great deal of uncertainty and volatility in all spheres of life. New processes and technologies are fundamentally changing the way we do things and the underlying business models of organizations. There is only one constant in this universe and that constant is change.

Historical Context for Change

Until the 17th century, wealth was created through Agriculture. Uncontrollable factors such as bad weather, conflict & epidemics too played a major role. For most people, life was at subsistence level.

The Industrial age was characterized by numerous inventions. Supply & Demand was predictable, enabling companies to streamline their Supply Chains & Organizational Structures. Demand came from the domestic markets, & typically demand outstripped supply.

Over time, consumers became more discerning, technological improvements dramatically improved productivity, globalization gradually took place & competition increased. Organizations focused on leveraging the expertise of their people.

The current phase is dominated by the trend of Digitalization. The pace of change has increased exponentially. Traditional business models are being disrupted in various industries. Organizations are increasingly in need of high-grade, specialist staff.

Environmental Triggers Of Change

External factors that influence change

Technology

Increased competition

Social trends

Key Issues around Change

Things to understand:

Change Models & Frameworks

Change can be of various kinds:

Here are the various Change models and frameworks

Lewin’s Change Model suggests that implementing a change requires going through the following stages – unfreezing, changing and refreezing (Lewin, 1951). Unfreezing requires considering the current system or procedure as that of urgent concern. Changing is where one moves to the new system (from the old system)and Refreezing is the act of incorporating the new change into the strategic objective of the company.

Kotter’s change model: This model emphasizes the need to adopt a more holistic approach to incoporate changes. Various steps required to bring about change include creating a sense of urgency, forming coalitions, developing and communicating a vision, removing obstacles, empowering employees, creating short-term wins, consolidating gains, brining change in the culture. (Kotter, 1996).

McKinsey’s 7s Model suggests the various areas of changes to be grouped into two categories: the soft and the hard areas. The hard areas inlcudes the system, strategy and structure while the soft system areas include skills, style, staff and shared values which are usually difficult to manage but are important source of sustainable competitive advantage (Peters and Waterman, 1982).

References

KOTTER, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, Mass, Harvard Business School Press.

Lewin, K., 1951. Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers (Edited by Dorwin Cartwright.).

Peters, T.J. & Waterman, R.H. (1982). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best run companies. London: Harper and Row.

Exit mobile version