BA Theories (Business Administration & Management)

Special Economic Zone (SEZ): Case Studies

Special Economic Zone SEZ

A special economic zone (SEZ) is an area within a country that has business-friendly trade and business laws and is subjected to different economic regulations from the rest of the country. SEZs are set up to boost economic activity, promote exports, boost investments, develop infrastructure as well as create employment opportunities.

Special Economic Zone (SEZ): Importance and useful case studies.

  1. understand how outsourcing has influenced international trade  
  2. Critically explain the use of SEZ  
  3. Analyse the stakeholders and their positions on SEZ

Special Economic Zones (SEZ) – Purpose

Functions of Special Economic Zones – Government perspective

Functions of Special Economic Zone-TNC perspective

China’s first Special Economic Zone: A success story

When Shenzhen was first selected it was a fishing village of 30,000 residents. It didn’t even have a traffic light! Now it has a population of 12.53 million. It has developed from a city known for manufacturing to a city for innovation. Yeung et al, 2009 (Read here).

Watch this video on Shenzhen in your own time. It is good for developing your understanding further of how Special Economic Zones work to attract innovation and young talent.

Clark Freeport Zone

What are the benefits of the Clark Freeport Zone?

Clark Freeport Zone is a special economic zone.

“Industrial zones with special incentives set up to attract foreign investors, in which imported materials undergo some degree of processing before being (re)-exported again” (www.ilo.org).

Watch this video introducing Clark Freeport Zone.

2017 Clark Freeport AVP

Read more about the history here.

Not All SEZs Are Successful

Special Economic Zones in countries such as China have worked well. However, this is not the case everywhere, read here. They have also been a failure in other countries.

An export processing zone (EPZ) in Dakar, the capital of Senegal, failed due to:

Here are reasons for the failure of SEZs.

Special Economic Zones and Human Right Abuses

Human rights are rights inherent to all human beings, regardless of race, sex, nationality, ethnicity, language, religion, or any other status. Human rights include the right to life and liberty, freedom from slavery and torture, freedom of opinion and expression, the right to work and education, and many more.  Everyone is entitled to these rights, without discrimination.

International Commission of Jurists. The Human Rights abuses of local communities and workers in Special Economic Zones in Myanmar. Read about it here.

Civil society groups have documented human rights violations by the State and human rights abuses by companies resulting from a lack of meaningful consultation, inadequate compensation and limited access to remedies for persons displaced in the development of SEZs in Dawei and Thilawa. 

People living on land acquired for these SEZs were displaced without proper planning for involuntary resettlement and before an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) was undertaken. Minor infrastructure facilities constructed for the Kyauk Phyu SEZ in 2014 resulted in a deterioration in living standards for persons displaced from farmland. 

Special Economic Zones and Environmental Issues

Thailand has several SEZs including one which borders with Myanmar.  Open Development Thailand conducted some research into the environmental issues in SEZ in Thailand. They found: reserved forests, water and air quality, and waste management are effected.

  

The increased demand for land to develop infrastructure as a result of SEZ policies has increased the pressure on forests and agricultural areas. Forested land allocated for infrastructure development as a result of SEZ policies has been chosen from both forest reserves and areas considered to be degraded forests. There are cases where this land has been viewed before these allocations as public land.

These allocations are controversial because they enable government agencies and the private sector to plan land-use changes, without considering existing forest ecosystems or local uses. These situations often lead to conflict. 

Exit mobile version